Header graphic for print

Vorys Health Care Advisors

 
For health care reformers, the challenge is to improve care quality and expand access to providers and services while controlling costs. It is not a job for the timid. Instead, it requires creativity, experience and leadership. Vorys Health Care Advisors’ strategic solutions and guidance exemplify each of these imperatives. We help providers, business decision makers, state and federal government agencies and professional associations respond to the complex needs of health care consumers by discovering, developing and implementing innovative policies and programs.

Former Ohio Supreme Court Justice Evelyn Lundberg Stratton to Join Vorys, Assist Vorys Health Care Advisors

Posted in Uncategorized

Evelyn Lundberg Stratton, who most recently served for 16 years as a justice on the Supreme Court of Ohio, will join Vorys, Sater, Seymour and Pease LLP, where she will continue to pursue her passion for public service and provide strategic legal counsel to the firm’s clients.  In addition to her work with Vorys clients in the areas of health care, litigation and appellate work, she will also assist Vorys Health Care Advisors, a wholly owned subsidiary of the firm that helps health care providers, business decision makers and professional associations deal with health care issues.

Read the full announcement for additional information.

Health Care Reform Pay or Play Penalties for Employers

Posted in Affordable Care Act, Health Care Reform

In this Labor and Employment Alert, Vorys attorneys discuss proposed federal regulations regarding health care reform pay or play penalties that will impact applicable large employers.

If you are an employer, read the alert to determine whether/how you will be impacted.

No Enhanced Federal Funds For Partial Medicaid Expansion

Posted in Affordable Care Act, Health Care Reform, Medicaid

Last week, 11 governors – including those in Ohio, Arizona, Louisiana, Florida, Virginia, Iowa, Maine, Mississippi, South Dakota, Utah, and Wyoming - submitted a letter to Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius asking whether states that expand Medicaid eligibility to a level less than that included in the Affordable Care Act (ACA) are eligible to receive the enhanced federal funding that goes along with the ACA expansion.  On Monday, Secretary Sebelius told these governors that there will be no enhanced match for a partial Medicaid expansion.

Under the ACA, states are required to expand their Medicaid programs to cover many individuals earning incomes up to 138% of the Federal Poverty Level (FPL), or about $31,809 for a family of four.  States that expand their Medicaid programs to include individuals earning up to 138% of the FPL will receive enhanced federal reimbursement for this population – 100% initially, eventually moving down to 90%.  The regular federal match rate for Medicaid varies by state from 50% to 78%

This summer’s decision by the United States Supreme Court, however, made the Medicaid expansion optional.  Following the decision, states began to explore the idea of expanding their Medicaid programs to cover uninsured individuals earning incomes less than 138% of the FPL; for example, up to 100% of the FPL.

Under the ACA, individuals earning between 100% of the FPL ($20,050 for a family of four) and 400% of the FPL ($80,200 for a family of four) will be eligible for federal subsidies to purchase health insurance in the Health Insurance Exchange.  So some states advocated for expanding Medicaid eligibility up to 100% of the FPL (instead of 138%) in order to cover many currently uninsured individuals, and allowing individuals earning between 100% and 400% of the FPL to purchase health insurance in the Exchange, receiving federal financial assistance to do so.

On Monday, however, Secretary Sebelius made clear that states are not eligible for the enhanced federal funding unless they expand Medicaid eligibility up to 138% of the FPL.  Now that states have this guidance from the federal government, they can continue to understand the financial viability of the decision to expand Medicaid.

Policy experts have expressed differing views as to whether the ACA allows states to expand Medicaid to a threshold less than 138% of the FPL.  One interpretation is that the expansion population constitutes a coverage group that must be treated as a whole.  Another interpretation is that, in light of the Supreme Court’s determination that the expansion is optional, states can choose to cover all or part of the expansion population.  Questions regarding whether a state can seek a waiver to cover part of the expansion group remain. 

On Monday, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services also released a series of Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) that seeks to assist states in the implementation of the Affordable Care Act.  The FAQs address:

  • Exchanges, market reforms and Medicaid
  • Dual eligibles and Medicare cost sharing
  • Eligibility and enrollment systems
  • Eligibility policy
  • Coordination across insurance affordability programs
  • Section 1115 waiver transitions
  • Children’s Health Insurance Program
  • Benefits/delivery system
  • Federal Medical Assistance Percentages

Feds Extend Deadline for State Exchanges Again

Posted in Affordable Care Act, Health Care Reform

On Thursday, Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius extended the deadline to December 14 for states to submit letters of intent to build state-based health insurance exchanges. The original deadline had been today, Friday, November 16.

Secretary Sebelius’ letter announcing the extension was in response to a request by the Republican Governors Association for additional time.  In her letter, Secretary Sebelius indicates that states have until December 14 to submit both a letter of intent and an application for the state to run its own state-based exchange.  States have until February 15, 2013, to apply to run its exchange in partnership with the federal government.

HHS Extends Deadline for State-Based Exchanges

Posted in Health Care Reform

In a letter to governors on Friday, Secretary Kathleen Sebelius of the U. S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) announced that HHS is extending the deadline for State-based Exchange Blueprint application submissions to Friday, December 14,2012.

Read the letter or Kaiser Health News’ breaking news bulletin for full details.

Changes to Federal EHR Rule Will Likely Benefit Medicaid Providers

Posted in Health Care, Medicaid

Vorys’ HealtHITech Law blog recently shared news regarding two key changes to federal rules related to implementation of electronic health records (EHR) for Medicaid providers.  These two changes are likely to benefit providers seeking Medicaid incentive payments for EHR.

Read about these changes and others included in the Medicare and Medicaid EHR Incentive Programs Stage 2 final rule on the Vorys HealtHITech Law blog.

Webinar: Recent Labor Law Developments for the Health Care Employer

Posted in Health Care

Join Vorys for a complimentary webinar, Friday, October 26 from 12:00 – 1:00 p.m. (Eastern Time).

Recent Labor Law Developments for the Health Care Employer

Vorys partner Nelson Cary will discuss the following in his presentation:

  • Update on Status of National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) and Department of Labor Rulemaking Activities
  • The NLRB’s Relentless Focus on Employer Handbooks and Other Policies
  • Protected Concerted Activity, and its Application in the Social Media Context
  • Wage/Hour Enforcement Issues from the Department of Labor

RSVP or for more information: Contact Kayla Allen at ksallen@vorys.com

Log-in information will be provided before the session. The presentation will be followed by Q&A. Mr. Cary is the editor of the blog Vorys on Labor. The blog focuses on traditional labor issues of interest to labor professionals in both the public and private sector.

States Begin to Choose Essential Health Benefits for Their Citizens

Posted in Health Care Reform, Medicaid

Although not a “hard” deadline, states were encouraged to submit to the federal government by Monday, October 1, 2012, their lists of essential health benefits required by the Affordable Care Act (ACA).  Essential health benefits are a set of health care service categories that must be covered by certain plans beginning in 2014.  According to the Health Affairs Blog, as of October 3, 2012, 20 states plus the District of Columbia have made at least a preliminary decision about the minimum set of benefits to which millions of their residents will be entitled.

Essential health benefit requirements apply to individual and small group plans sold inside and outside of Health Insurance Exchanges.  Health Insurance Exchanges are mechanisms provided for in the ACA that will allow individuals to purchase affordable health insurance.  They are scheduled to launch in January 2014.  The requirements also apply to benefits provided to individuals who will be newly eligible for Medicaid coverage provided as part of the ACA’s Medicaid expansion.  Essential health benefit requirements do not apply to self-insured health plans, the method by which most large companies cover their employees.

According to Kaiser Health News, “The health law lists 10 broad categories of essential benefits, including preventive care, emergency services, maternity care, hospital and doctors’ services, and prescription drugs.  States have latitude within those categories, and so far nearly all have selected as a benchmark for minimum coverage one of the three most popular small group health plans available to residents now.  Because these plans vary and states can tinker with specific benefits to comply with federal requirements, the minimum benefits available to consumers in California will be different from those for people in New York, for example.”

State Refor(u)m provides additional information regarding the benchmark plans states have chosen.  For example, Arizona has selected as its benchmark plan the state employee plan, while New York has decided on a small group plan.  Some states, like North Carolina, have not yet chosen a plan.  Ohio and several other states—including Alabama, Florida, Iowa, Indiana, Louisiana, New  Jersey, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Wisconsin, and West Virginia—have indicated that they are awaiting additional federal guidance before making a selection.

On December 16, 2011, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) issued a bulletin providing information and soliciting comments on the regulatory approach that HHS proposed to define essential health benefits under the ACA.  HHS has not yet issued final guidance regarding essential health benefits, and is not expected to do so until after the November election

Vorys’ Labor and Employment Alert Offers Guidance on Full-Time Employee Status and Other Employee Benefits News

Posted in Health Care Reform

Vorys’ Labor and Employment Alert offers important information regarding shared responsibility penalties on large employers that fail to offer health coverage to all of their full-time employees (or offer health coverage to full-time employees that is deemed to be unaffordable or inadequate).  This piece offers a wealth of information for employers contemplating the effects of the Affordable Care Act.